MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413744824 · doi:10.1097/qmh.0000000000000484

Investigation of Preventive Care in Sweden: Actions Planned and Performed in Response to Health Risks in Older Adults in Care

2025· article· en· W4413744824 on OpenAlex
Deborah Finkel, Marie Ernsth Bravell, Ulrika Lindmark, Björn Westerlind, Linda Johansson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueQuality Management in Health Care · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFrailty in Older Adults
Canadian institutionsSNC-Lavalin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreventive careHealth careMedicineEnvironmental healthNursingPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Preventive care is vital in maintaining health and supporting independence among older persons. In Sweden, a national quality register (Senior Alert) was developed in elder care to support healthcare workers working to prevent malnutrition, falls, pressure ulcers, and poor oral health. However, we predicted that challenges in providing care at home result in preventive work being least used when and where it would be most effective: early in disease processes. The current study examines the preventive care actions planned and performed for older persons with identified risks, to compare quality and equity of care in different care settings. METHODS: Persons from the Swedish Screening Across the Lifespan Twin Study registered in the Senior Alert were included in the study (N = 2914). Descriptive and analytical statistical analyses regarding risk assessment and planned and performed preventive actions were conducted among those persons registered in hospitals, home health care, nursing homes, dementia care homes, or short-term nursing homes. RESULTS: Almost 80% of the sample had identified risk in at least one of the four risk areas, with falls and malnutrition being most common. Risks differed between care settings, and having any risk was most common among older persons in short-term nursing homes. The largest difference between planned and performed actions was for older persons with home health care, and especially true for the oldest persons (>80 years old). CONCLUSIONS: Preventive care is vital as it is often easier to prevent than treat, and pressure ulcers, malnutrition, poor oral health, and falls are common among older persons. However, preventive actions were less likely to be performed in the home health care, especially for the oldest adults. Reasons for this might be related to challenges of performing care in a person's home, lack of knowledge, and organizational challenges, but further investigation is needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.291
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.428
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it