A Machine Learning Model for Predicting Sarcopenia Among Middle-Aged Adults: Development and External Validation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Sarcopenia is a common muscle disorder in older adults, and its early identification and management in middle-aged populations are essential for ensuring a healthier later life. Detecting sarcopenia at an earlier stage may reduce the future burden on health care systems and enhance the quality of life in older adults. Machine learning (ML) models can evaluate large datasets, identify essential variables, and find complicated correlations between input variables. However, using ML models to detect sarcopenia remains an unsatisfied need. Objective This study aimed to develop and externally validate an ML model to predict sarcopenia risk among middle-aged adults using a nationally representative dataset. Methods We analyzed data from 1926 participants aged 40 to 64 years and enrolled in the 2022 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES). Sarcopenia was diagnosed and defined based on the 2019 Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia criteria, which incorporate both low muscle mass and reduced muscle strength. Muscle mass was assessed using bioelectrical impedance analysis with cutoffs of <7.0 kg/m² for men and <5.7 kg/m² for women. Muscle strength was measured via handgrip strength using a digital dynamometer with thresholds of <28 kg for men and <18 kg for women. Participants meeting both criteria were classified as those with sarcopenia. Four ML algorithms, random forest, support vector machine, extreme gradient boosting, and logistic regression, were used to identify risk factors of sarcopenia and predict its likelihood. The top-performing model was subsequently validated in an external cohort of 2247 middle-aged adults from the 2023 KNHANES. Model performance was assessed using the F2-score, area under the curve of a receiver operating characteristic curve, and sensitivity. All analyses were conducted using Python 3.13.2 (Python Software Foundation). Results Among the 4 models, the logistic regression model demonstrated the strongest performance, yielding an area under the curve of 0.85, a sensitivity of 0.92, and an F2-score of 0.66. External validation using the 2023 KNHANES dataset confirmed the model’s robust performance, indicating its potential for widespread applications. Conclusions This study developed and externally validated an ML model that accurately identified sarcopenia in middle-aged adults. Leveraging data from a comprehensive national survey, our findings underscore the significance of early detection and customized interventions in midlife to mitigate sarcopenia risk and optimize long-term health outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.022 | 0.028 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".