MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413745928 · doi:10.1364/jocn.561775

Multi-task localization based on Φ-OTDR: composite vibration recognition, synchronous localization, and co-trench position

2025· article· en· W4413745928 on OpenAlexaff
Wenxin Liu, Zhiwei Wang, Qiuyan Yao, Mingyuan Wu, Tiankuo Yu, Jie Zhang, Mohamed Cheriet

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Optical Communications and Networking · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors
Canadian institutionsUniversité du QuébecCentrale des Syndicats du QuébecUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaState Key Laboratory of Information Photonics and Optical CommunicationsChina Association for Science and Technology
KeywordsPosition (finance)Composite numberVibrationComputer scienceTask (project management)Optical time-domain reflectometerTrenchAcousticsEngineeringOptical fiberTelecommunicationsMaterials sciencePhysicsFiber optic sensorAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In optical fiber networks, ensuring reliability is crucial as both newly activated and pre-existing associated services encounter co-trenching risks and potential security threats. To address these challenges, we propose a Φ-OTDR-based multi-task localization framework integrating composite vibration event recognition, synchronous localization, and co-trench position detection. Analyzing real-time vibration signals, our method achieves 95.41% event synchronous positioning, 99.50% event classification, and 92.25% co-trench location accuracy, with 98.17% robustness on 400 test samples. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework in enhancing the safety of optical fibers and supporting the stable operation of optical fiber networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Optical Communications and NetworkingSame topicAdvanced Fiber Optic SensorsFrench-language works237,207