Bibliographic record
Abstract
Among fellow writers, Robert Desnos was often described with the same word: voyant, as in clairvoyant, a seer. Within the first group of surrealists who gathered for dream-induced, automatic writing sessions, Desnos stood out for his uncanny productivity. He somehow saw more than anyone else. This article examines his prophetic eye in Desnos’ final novel, Le Vin est tiré (Citation1943), which follows a group of opium addicts in interwar Paris. Read through the lens of what Laurent de Sutter calls “narcocapitalism,” an order in which modern political subjectivity is constructed through the production, sale, and consumption of drugs, this paper argues that Le Vin est tiré (Desnos Citation1943) is not simply a sympathetic portrayal of drug addiction, but rather an urgent call for political freedom. By analyzing the novel in light of de Sutter’s theoretical intervention, this paper aims to elucidate the relationship between literary fiction and political subjectivity, revealing new avenues for making and unmaking a given social order. This political dimension is studied through a comparison with two key influences on Robert Desnos’s novel, Gérard de Nerval and Jean-Paul Sartre.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".