MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413755127 · doi:10.1109/tia.2025.3603515

Modulation Index Optimization and Fault Blocking Capability of Transformer-Less Modular Multilevel DC–DC Converters

2025· article· en· W4413755127 on OpenAlexaff
Fei Zhang, Yuanshi Zhang, Yiqi Liu, Liwei Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industry Applications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHVDC Systems and Fault Protection
Canadian institutionsOpal-Rt Technologies (Canada)Okanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsConvertersModular designTransformerElectronic engineeringModulation indexModulation (music)Blocking (statistics)Computer scienceElectrical engineeringEngineeringPulse-width modulationVoltagePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-power DC-DC Converters are crucial for interconnecting HVDC systems with different voltage levels. This paper presents the optimal design and operation of transformer-less hybrid modular multilevel dc-dc converters (MMDCs) that consist of both the half bridge submodules (HBSMs) and the full bridge submodules (FBSMs). Since the arm internal dc component voltage and ac component voltage can be freely selected, the optimal modulation index that minimizes the kVA of switches is derived for different voltage conversion ratios. Overmodulation is also considered to minimize the cost of the converter. For system security and reliability reasons, the dc fault-blocking capability is a preferred feature of dc-dc converters for HVDC applications. Benefitting from using the hybrid SMs, the dc fault-blocking capability of hybrid MMDCs is also investigated. The performance of the hybrid MMDC is validated by real-time simulation and a lab-scale test bench.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.874
Threshold uncertainty score0.902

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industry ApplicationsSame topicHVDC Systems and Fault ProtectionFrench-language works237,207