Esc: An Early-Stopping Checker for Budget-Aware Index Tuning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Index tuning is a time-consuming process. One major performance bottleneck in existing index tuning systems is the large amount of "what-if" query optimizer calls that estimate the cost of a given pair of query and index configuration without materializing the indexes. There has been recent work on budget-aware index tuning that limits the amount of what-if calls allowed in index tuning. Existing budget-aware index tuning algorithms, however, typically make fast progress early on in terms of the best configuration found but slow down when more and more what-if calls are allocated. This observation of "diminishing return" on index quality leads us to introduce early stopping for budget-aware index tuning, where user specifies a threshold on the tolerable loss of index quality and we stop index tuning if the projected loss with the remaining budget is below the threshold. We further propose Esc, a low-overhead early-stopping checker that realizes this new functionality. Experimental evaluation on top of both industrial benchmarks and real customer workloads demonstrates that Esc can significantly reduce the number of what-if calls made during budget-aware index tuning while incurring little or zero improvement loss and little extra computational overhead compared to the overall index tuning time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.049 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".