MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413755925 · doi:10.14778/3718057.3718077

FLEET: High-Performance Durable Replicated State Machines Using Scattered and Coordinated Log Entries

2025· article· en· W4413755925 on OpenAlexaff
Hua Fan, Hao Tan, Wenchao Zhou, Feifei Li

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the VLDB Endowment · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed systems and fault tolerance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsState (computer science)Computer scienceEnvironmental scienceAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Distributed coordination services are fundamental components of distributed systems, employing durable replicated state machines (RSMs) to ensure consistency across replicas and prevent data loss, even in the event of all nodes failing. These services typically rely on persistent logs for rapid recovery, as a universally agreed-upon log allows replicas to restore their state by sequentially replaying ordered log entries. However, the requirement for a totally ordered log inherently limits opportunities for parallelism. This paper introduces Fleet, a high-performance durable RSM protocol that combines a hybrid scattered-entry log with an asynchronous ordered log. Our approach integrates synchronous persistence of scattered entries with asynchronous persistence of ordered entries, ensuring both rapid recovery and high levels of parallelism. Additionally, we propose a parallel applying optimization for the etcd database, named pre-apply. Experimental results demonstrate that Fleet significantly outperforms Raft and Scalog in terms of throughput and latency, achieving up to 10× the throughput under specific configurations and scaling effectively across multiple nodes. Additionally, with the pre-apply optimization, Fleet delivers a 10-fold increase in throughput compared to sequential applying on etcd. Although Fleet incurs a 5% overhead in recovery time during leader failure, this delay is tolerable given the rarity of such events.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.136
Threshold uncertainty score0.514

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the VLDB EndowmentSame topicDistributed systems and fault toleranceFrench-language works237,207