MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4413763226 · doi:10.1186/s12889-025-24356-x

Factors associated with inequalities in malnutrition among children in Ghana using the 2022 GDHS and WHO HEAT framework

2025· article· en· W4413763226 on OpenAlexaff
Eugene Budu, Ebenezer Kwesi Armah‐Ansah, Nhyira Owusuaa Gyawu, Rabbi Tweneboah, Kwamena Sekyi Dickson, Charity Oga‐Omenka, Elom Otchi

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Public Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicChild Nutrition and Water Access
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBiostatisticsMalnutritionEnvironmental healthPublic healthInequalitySevere Acute MalnutritionEpidemiologyPediatricsInternal medicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Childhood malnutrition can impair physical and cognitive development, thereby diminishing productivity at adulthood. Current research recognizes the crucial impact of early childhood nutrition on the long-term health and well-being of children. Ghana has achieved notable progress in lowering childhood malnutrition; nevertheless, it remains a major concern. This study advances current understanding on the socioeconomic drivers and magnitude of child malnutrition in the Ghanaian context. METHODS: We used data from 2022 Ghana Demographic and Health Survey to analyze inequalities in malnutrition among children This study was an analytical cross-sectional survey that covered a total weighted sample of 4,935 women aged 15-49. Simple measures of inequality [difference (D), and Ratio (R)], and complex measures of inequality [Population Attributable risk (PAR), and Population Attributable Fraction (PAF)] were performed using the World Health Organization's Health Equity Assessment Toolkit (WHO's HEAT) software. Six equity stratifiers examined malnutrition among children in Ghana: child's age, economic status, educational status, place of residence, sex of child, and subnational region. RESULTS: Overall, out of the four child malnutrition indicators used, stunting was the highest with 17.4%. We observed age (D = 7.2, UI = 4.0- 10.4, PAF=-67.7, UI=-67.9- -67.4), maternal education (R = 1.8, UI = 1.5-2.1; PAF=-18.8, UI=-18.8--18.7), place of residence (R = 1.3, UI = 1.1-1.6; PAF=-13.4, UI=-13.4--13.3), and subnational region (D = 19.1, UI = 13.5-24.8; PAR=-6.9, UI=-10.1--3.8). CONCLUSION: This study revealed the existence of inequalities in malnutrition among children in Ghana, which is influenced by child's age, maternal economic status, maternal education, place of residence, and subnational region. To tackle the issues of child malnutrition in Ghana, it is vital to implement targeted interventions that address age-related disparities and implement social protection programs. Subnational region disparities must be addressed by directing resources to areas vulnerable to malnutrition, such as Northern Ghana, adapting interventions to local needs, and improving infrastructure to facilitate better healthcare and nutrition access in rural communities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score0.249

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Public Health→Same topicChild Nutrition and Water Access→French-language works237,207→