MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413767126 · doi:10.1007/s40120-025-00815-w

Global Societal Burden of Alzheimer’s Disease by Severity: a Targeted Literature Review

2025· review· en· W4413767126 on OpenAlex
Maria A. Cavaco, Se Ryeong Jang, Christopher Olsen, Carolyn Bodnar, Nicole Ferko

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology and Therapy · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsEVERSANA (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNeurologyDiseaseAlzheimer's diseaseBurden of diseaseIntensive care medicinePsychiatryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is among the costliest of illnesses for the elderly, placing a significant burden on healthcare systems and caregivers. Despite the depth of evidence, reviews lack a holistic assessment of such costs, falling short of illustrating unmet medical needs. The objective of this review was to therefore characterize the total societal economic burden of AD, broken down by care setting and disease severity. A targeted literature search of systematic reviews, cost-of-illness, and observational studies published between 2013 and 2024 was conducted on MEDLINE and Embase to identify articles reporting the economic burden of AD. Grey literature was hand-searched. Both direct and indirect costs were assessed, including societal burdens not often reported by AD-specific cost-of-illness studies such as financial delinquencies. In total, 81 articles were reviewed in depth, including 20 systematic reviews and 61 studies or reports. Findings consistently demonstrated that societal costs of AD or dementia typically increased by at least 50% between consecutive severity levels, increasing with disease progression. Informal caregiving often comprised close to half of societal costs, regardless of care setting, disease severity, or region. While studies reporting costs of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) were limited, the economic burden reported for this stage was appreciable compared to mild AD. Evidence for the impact of AD, as early as MCI, on quality of life (e.g., emotional and mental strain) and personal financial management capabilities was also identified. This review provides a comprehensive overview, from studies spanning over more than a decade, of the substantial societal economic burden associated with AD, across cost categories, care settings, disease stages, and regions. This review may be used to inform health economic evaluations of novel interventions with potential to reduce the enormous and growing global economic burden of AD and dementia. This review presents a comprehensive overview on the last decade of key studies reporting societal costs related to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and dementia globally. A strong focus was placed on assessing how costs, including those reflecting changes in day-to-day behaviors owing to memory deficits (e.g., deteriorating financial capabilities, getting lost in streets), vary by care setting and disease severity across regions. Across 81 studies, this review showed that indirect costs attributed to unpaid, informal caregiving represented a large proportion of total costs, often reaching close to 50% of the total societal burden, depending on stage of disease and region. Many studies reported a weekly rate of 60 h or more for informal caregiving time, and this increased when progressing from mild AD to more severe stages. Overall, total costs increased with progression from mild to severe disease, often by at least 1.5 × with long-term care costs becoming higher with moderate/severe AD. Costs related to the reduction in mental and emotional wellbeing of patients increased with disease severity, as did that of the caregiver, particularly in the mild-to-moderate stages of AD. The cost of financial scams increased by ₤194 from the mild-to-moderate AD stage. Furthermore, the large loss in tax payments to the government (up to €28,142) and reduced consumer spending over the lifetime of a patient with AD demonstrates the profound impact of the disease on public economics. Taken together, this study provides a complete viewpoint and framework for assessing total societal impact in economic evaluations of therapies targeted to slow disease progression of AD and dementia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.951
Threshold uncertainty score0.942

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it