Aliocha Wald Lasowski, Imaginaire et politique de la créolisation : Édouard Glissant et nous. Conversations avec Valerio Adami, Zineb Ali-Benali, Souleymane Bachir Diagne, Tahar Ben Jelloun, Fethi Benslama, Tanella Boni, Pierre Brunel, Maryse Condé, Raphaël Confiant, Régis Debray, Mireille Delmas-Marty, Joël Des Rosiers, Michaël Ferrier, Thiago Florencio, Satoshi Hirota, Fabienne Kanor, Dany Laferrière, Amin Maalouf, Alain Mabanckou, Jean-Luc Mélenchon, Edgar Morin, Pierre Nepveu, George Pau-Langevin, Ernest Pépin, Thula Pires, Guillaume Robillard, Michael Roch, Boualem Sansal, Felwine Sarr, Simone Schwarz-Bart, Benjamin Stora, Louis-Georges Tin, Yann Toma, Michel Tremblay et Abdourahman Ali Waberi, Paris, Éditions de l’Aube, coll. « Monde en cours », 2023, 370 p.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aliocha Wald Lasowski, Imaginaire et politique de la créolisation : Édouard Glissant et nous. Conversations avec Valerio Adami, Zineb Ali-Benali, Souleymane Bachir Diagne, Tahar Ben Jelloun, Fethi Benslama, Tanella Boni, Pierre Brunel, Maryse Condé, Raphaël Confiant, Régis Debray, Mireille Delmas-Marty, Joël Des Rosiers, Michaël Ferrier, Thiago Florencio, Satoshi Hirota, Fabienne Kanor, Dany Laferrière, Amin Maalouf, Alain Mabanckou, Jean-Luc Mélenchon, Edgar Morin, Pierre Nepveu, George Pau-Langevin, Ernest Pépin, Thula Pires, Guillaume Robillard, Michael Roch, Boualem Sansal, Felwine Sarr, Simone Schwarz-Bart, Benjamin Stora, Louis-Georges Tin, Yann Toma, Michel Tremblay et Abdourahman Ali Waberi, Paris, Éditions de l’Aube, coll. « Monde en cours », 2023, 370 p.. Un article de la revue Francophonies d'Amérique (Au-delà de la consécration : sur quelques romans acadiens non canoniques des années 1972 à 2000) diffusée par la plateforme Érudit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.014 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".