MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413785933 · doi:10.1139/facets-2025-0069

The importance of hydrogeomorphic setting for total mercury and methylmercury export from fen wetlands in western Canada

2025· article· en· W4413785933 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Colin P. R. McCarter, Scott J. Ketcheson, Haiyong Huang, Carl P. J. Mitchell

Bibliographic record

VenueFACETS · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMercury impact and mitigation studies
Canadian institutionsAthabasca UniversityThe Scarborough HospitalUniversity of TorontoNipissing University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsWetlandMethylmercuryMercury (programming language)Environmental scienceHydrology (agriculture)Environmental chemistryEcologyChemistryGeologyBioaccumulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The export of neurotoxic mercury (Hg) and its bioavailable form, methylmercury (MeHg), from wetland-dominated catchments is common throughout boreal regions. Wetlands vary significantly, however, in their degree of minerotrophy, which affects wetland Hg cycling and is related to their hydrogeomorphic setting. In this field study, we highlight how hydrogeomorphic setting, expressed as degree of minerotrophy, impacts streamwater total-Hg (THg) and MeHg export from Canadian Western Boreal Plain, fen-dominated catchments along a series of increasing minerotrophy (poor fen < moderate fen < channel fen < rich fen). Streamwater from the catchments dominated by less minerotrophic poor and moderate fens had the highest study period MeHg yields (13 and 19 mg km−2, respectively) and percent MeHg in exported streamwater, while THg yield was greatest from the rich fen headwaters (260 mg km−2). MeHg and THg yields decreased within the rich fen. Decreases in the rich fen MeHg concentrations and yields coincides with greater total manganese, suggesting manganese redox chemistry may be important in regulating MeHg cycling and/or mobility in more minerotrophic wetlands. We extend previous studies showing some swamps to be net MeHg importers to include rich fens as another wetland type that removes MeHg from streamwaters and provides another possible mechanism, manganese reduction, that influences MeHg cycling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.106

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFACETSSame topicMercury impact and mitigation studiesFrench-language works237,207