Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In order to study the gas leakage process of spacecraft when the hole forms due to space debris impact, this paper uses different approximation levels to construct the model from the perspective of macroscopic gas flow. The ideal incompressible gas single outlet model uses Torricelli’s theorem and the ideal gas equation of state to analyse the transient gas flow in the hole by assuming that the instantaneous density of the gas flowing through the hole does not change. On the basis of the incompressible model, the ideal compressible gas single outlet model is solved by considering the compressibility of the gas, and according to the relationship between the flow velocity and pressure in the critical flow state of the gas, combined with the ideal gas equation of state. Based on the area-velocity equation, the ideal compressible gas Laval nozzle model analyses the relationship between pressure, temperature, flow velocity, and other parameters during supersonic flow for the Laval nozzle shape opening. These three models are gradually advanced from simple to complex, from idealized to close to reality, which provides theoretical support for the study of spacecraft air leakage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".