MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413786066 · doi:10.1109/tpel.2025.3586432

Magnetized Dickson Charge Pump Inverters

2025· article· en· W4413786066 on OpenAlexafffund
S. Esmaeili, Frederick Nana Oppong, Ashraf Ali Khan, John E. Quaicoe

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPlasma Diagnostics and Applications
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsElectrical engineeringCharge pumpCharge (physics)PhysicsVoltageCapacitorEngineeringElectronic engineeringQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A class of high step-up single-stage inverters based on magnetically coupled inductors and a Dickson charge pump (CP) technique is presented. Firstly, the magnetized Dickson charge pump inverter (MDCPI) is presented, producing a higher voltage gain with fewer components than its counterparts. Unlike conventional magnetically coupled impedance source networks, the suggested structure provides a substantial voltage boost at a meager shoot-through duty ratio range of 0 to 10%. Thus, it offers a high step-up ability with high modulation index and smaller number of winding turns. Hence, the proposed inverter can be an excellent choice for applications with space constraints where the high output voltage, high power quality, and fewer components are the main issues. However, in addition to drawing discontinuous input current from the dc source, the topology requires tight magnetic coupling to reduce the effect of the leakage inductance. In order to address the aforementioned drawbacks, an improved MDCPI (IMDCPI) is proposed. Although the IMDCPI employs more passive components, it delivers a higher output voltage with reduced dc-link voltage spikes across the inverter bridge. Compared with the existing voltage multipliers such as Dickson, Cockcroft–Walton, and Greinacher, the proposed structures do not require extension by adding extra stages and chains to obtain demanded high voltage. Additionally, the presented topologies solve the conventional voltage multipliers' drawbacks, including output voltage drop and significant voltage stress across the CP cells' capacitors. Input current ripple and flux density of the coupled transformer in IMDCPI is compared with its counterparts to demonstrate its improved features. Detailled experimental results are provided which verify the proposed inverters' performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.863
Threshold uncertainty score0.747

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power ElectronicsSame topicPlasma Diagnostics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207