MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413788732 · doi:10.1159/000547927

Mapping Disease Burden of Major Depressive Disorder and Its Risk Factors in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

2025· article· en· W4413788732 on OpenAlexaff
Qinyao Yu, Fanyu Xue, Sofia Laila Wik, Mingjun Gao, Yusuff Adebayo Adebisi, Don Eliseo Lucero‐Prisno, Claire Chenwen Zhong, Martin C. S. Wong, Junjie Huang

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychotherapy and Psychosomatics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMental Health Treatment and Access
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersChinese University of Hong Kong
KeywordsPsychologyPsychiatryBurden of diseaseMajor depressive disorderLow and middle income countriesDiseaseClinical psychologyMedicineDeveloping countryEconomic growthMoodEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is currently the second leading cause of life expectancy due to disability globally. This study aimed to examine the disease burden, risk factors, and temporal trends of MDD in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) from 1990 to 2021. METHODS: Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) data for 135 LMICs were obtained from the 2021 Global Burden of Disease (GBD) database. To assess trends in the burden of MDD over the past 3 decades, segmented regression analysis was applied to calculate the estimated annual percentage change. Spearman correlation analysis was conducted to examine the association between gross national income (GNI) and gender disparities in age-standardized DALY rates (ASDR) for MDD. We also explored how key risk factors - intimate partner violence, bullying victimization, and childhood sexual abuse - contributed to observed disparities. RESULTS: In 2021, LMICs accounted for 80.19% of the global burden of MDD. Age and gender disparities were significant, with DALY rates increasing markedly from adolescence and peaking around age 75. Gender disparities showed a higher burden among females, particularly in countries with higher GNI per capita. Analysis of risk factors revealed that intimate partner violence, bullying victimization, and childhood sexual assault were major contributors to the MDD burden, with notable variations across income levels and age groups. Temporal trends showed a marked increase in MDD burden across all income groups after 2019. CONCLUSION: MDD continues to impose a significant health burden in LMICs, disproportionately affecting females, youth, and elderly populations. The significant increase in MDD burden across all income groups after 2019 likely reflects the intensifying effects of global disruptions, with the COVID-19 pandemic being a key contributing factor. Populations with the highest burden also showed greater exposure to key risk factors. .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsychotherapy and PsychosomaticsSame topicMental Health Treatment and AccessFrench-language works237,207