MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413795156 · doi:10.3934/jimo.2025132

Sustainable inventory models with reduction on environmental emission and ordering costs under the discount policy of prepayment

2025· article· en· W4413795156 on OpenAlexaff
Jui‐Jung Liao, H. M. Srivastava, Shy‐Der Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Industrial and Management Optimization · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSupply Chain and Inventory Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrepayment of loanReduction (mathematics)Environmental policyComputable general equilibriumEconomicsEnvironmental economicsNatural resource economicsFinanceMicroeconomicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article integrates sustainability principles into a two-echelon supply chain comprising a single-vendor and single-buyer (SV-SB), balancing economic performance and environmental responsibility, as supply chain activities are major sources of environmental emissions. Following that, businesses are compelled to implement additional strategies that simultaneously lower operational costs and minimize environmental emissions. In line with this, the article considers a sustainable economic order quantity (SEOQ) inventory model within a carbon allowance policy. It will investigate the impact of strategic investments designed to reduce ordering and environmental emissions costs. On the other hand, this article considers a vendor who offers price discounts based on the number of advance payment installments. The highest discount is granted with full prepayment in a single installment, whereas partial prepayment yields a lower discount rate, which depends on the number of advance installments. The aim is to determine the optimal replenishment cycle, ordering cost, and environmental emission cost with closed-form solutions under various prepayment discount policies. A solution algorithm is developed to offer guidance for logistics managers on making informed decisions within a sustainable inventory framework. Finally, to demonstrate the model's effectiveness and managerial insights, numerical examples and sensitivity analyses are conducted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Industrial and Management OptimizationSame topicSupply Chain and Inventory ManagementFrench-language works237,207