Electrical Power Optimization of Cloud Data Centers Using Federated Learning Server Workload Allocation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cloud Data Centers (CDCs) are the foundation of the digital economy, enabling data storage, processing, and connectivity for different academia/industry/commerce activities and digital services worldwide. As a result, their consistent power supply and reliable performance are critical factors; however, few works have considered power consumption optimization based on intelligent workload allocation. To this end, the proposed paper presents a Federated Learning (FL)-based server workload allocation model for optimal power optimization. In this strategy, the servers are modeled based on their Central Processing Unit (CPU), memory, storage, and network usage. A global server is considered as the global model responsible for final workload allocation decisions. Each server acts as a client in the federated learning framework, sharing its derived parameters with the global model securely and federatedly. Finally, after ten epochs of the system running, the model could optimize the system, decrease the overall power consumption, and reduce the workload pressure in each server by distributing it to other servers. The model is evaluated using different Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), and an appendix is provided, including the full performance results, workload shifting logs, and server resource status. Overall, the suggested FL allocator model shows promise in significantly lowering power consumption and alleviating server workload efficiently.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".