MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413802164 · doi:10.1088/2634-4386/ae006b

Unsupervised sparse coding-based spiking neural network for real-time spike sorting

2025· article· en· W4413802164 on OpenAlexafffund
Alexis Melot, Sean U. N. Wood, Yannick Coffinier, Pierre Yger, Fabien Alibart

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuromorphic Computing and Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersEuropean Research CouncilAlliance de recherche numérique du CanadaMinistère de l'Économie, de l’Innovation et des Exportations du Québec
KeywordsSpike sortingNeuromorphic engineeringComputer scienceSpike (software development)Spiking neural networkNeural codingNeural decodingDecoding methodsArtificial intelligenceArtificial neural networkPattern recognition (psychology)PerceptronSortingAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Spike sorting is a crucial step in decoding multichannel extracellular neural signals, enabling the identification of individual neuronal activity. A key challenge in brain–machine interfaces is achieving real-time, low-power spike sorting at the edge while keeping high neural decoding performance. This study introduces the neuromorphic sparse sorter (NSS), a compact two-layer spiking neural network optimized for efficient spike sorting. NSS leverages the locally competitive algorithm for sparse coding to extract relevant features from noisy events with reduced computational demands. NSS learns to sort detected spike waveforms in an online fashion and operates entirely unsupervised. To exploit multi-bit spike coding capabilities of neuromorphic platforms like Intel’s Loihi 2, a custom neuron model was implemented, enabling flexible power-performance trade-offs via adjustable spike bit-widths. Evaluations on simulated and real-world tetrode signals with biological drift showed NSS outperformed established pipelines such as WaveClus3 and PCA + KMeans. With 2-bit graded spikes, NSS on Loihi 2 outperformed NSS implemented with leaky integrate-and-fire neuron and achieved an F 1 -score of 77% (+10% improvement) while consuming 8.6 mW (+1.65 mW) when tested on a drifting recording, with a computational processing time of 0.25 ms (+60 µ s) per inference.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuromorphic Computing and EngineeringSame topicAdvanced Memory and Neural ComputingFrench-language works237,207