MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413802924 · doi:10.29173/mlj1460

Interview with Greg Evans

2024· article· en· W4413802924 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bryan P Schwartz, Jodi Plenert

Bibliographic record

VenueManitoba Law Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticultural Socio-Legal Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer graphics (images)Computer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Interview conducted by Bryan P. Schwartz and Jodi Plenart. Greg Evans, K.C. has practiced family law exclusively since 1998. In March 2012, Greg formed the Evans Family Law Corporation, a collaborative family law practice offering an alternative to tradition litigation-based separation and divorce. Greg is a founding member of Collaborative Practice Manitoba, and has served as its Chair, a member of its Management Committee, and as a committee member. Greg taught the Clinical Family Law course from 2006 to 2019 at Robson Hall and continues to be a frequent speaker. He is also frequent presenter at legal forums like the Law Society of Manitoba and the Manitoba Bar Association, focusing on collaborative family law and related issues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueManitoba Law JournalSame topicMulticultural Socio-Legal StudiesFrench-language works237,207