MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413803413 · doi:10.3389/frvir.2025.1608416

Acceptability and effects on mental health of a music-based virtual reality intervention in geriatric outpatients: results from a pilot randomized controlled trial

2025· article· en· W4413803413 on OpenAlex
Kevin Galéry, Katia Djerroud, J.‐G. Chabot, Harmehr Sekhon, Thomas Tannou, Auriane Gros, Olivier Beauchet

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Virtual Reality · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMusic Therapy and Health
Canadian institutionsJewish General HospitalCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthMcGill UniversitySt Mary's Hospital CentreMcGill University Health CentreUniversité de MontréalInstitut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRandomized controlled trialIntervention (counseling)Mental healthMusic therapyPsychologyPhysical therapyMedicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Although the benefits of music on mental health are well established, few studies have investigated the impact of delivering it through virtual reality (VR) technologies. VR offers immersive experiences that can enhance mental health benefits in geriatric patients. However, accessibility to VR music-based interventions for geriatric outpatients remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the acceptability and effects of a music-based VR intervention on emotion, wellbeing and mood in geriatric outpatients living in Montreal (Quebec, Canada). Methods A single-center randomized controlled trial (RCT) with two parallel arms (i.e., control versus intervention) was conducted at the Montreal Geriatric University Institute (Quebec, Canada). A total of 41 outpatients from the geriatric and memory clinics were recruited and randomly assigned in the control group ( n = 20; music listening via headphones) and in the intervention group ( n = 21; VR-based music experience). The primary outcome was the acceptability of the intervention assessed using three complementary criteria: adoption defined as a retention rate ≥80%, satisfaction defined as willingness to reuse the intervention and perceived mental health benefits, and tolerance using the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire [SSQ] score (high tolerance defined by a score ≤9). Secondary outcomes were the effect on emotional state assessed with the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), on wellbeing assessed with the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS) and on mood states assessed with the Visual Analog Mood Scale (VAMS). Results High retention (95.2%), satisfaction (85.0%) and tolerance (95%) rates were observed in the intervention group. The PANAS positive score significantly improved in the VR group ( β = 15.9, 95% CI [6.8, 25.1], p = 0.001). No significant intergroup differences were observed for wellbeing and mood. Interpretation This study demonstrates that a music-based VR intervention was highly acceptable and led to a significant improvement in positive emotional state among older adults in geriatric outpatients. Clinical trial registration NCT06296199; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06296199 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it