MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413805079 · doi:10.1186/s12711-025-00994-y

randPedPCA: rapid approximation of principal components from large pedigrees

2025· article· en· W4413805079 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGenetics Selection Evolution · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Analysis with R
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
KeywordsPedigree chartPrincipal component analysisSingular value decompositionComputer scienceMatrix (chemical analysis)InverseAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceMathematicsBiologyGeneticsGeometryMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Pedigrees continue to be extremely important in agriculture and conservation genetics, with the pedigrees of modern breeding programmes easily comprising millions of records. This size can make visualising the structure of such pedigrees challenging. Being graphs, pedigrees can be represented as matrices, including, most commonly, the additive (numerator) relationship matrix, $$\varvec{A}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>A</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , and its inverse. With these matrices, the structure of pedigrees can then, in principle, be visualised via principal component analysis (PCA). However, the naive PCA of matrices for large pedigrees is challenging due to computational and memory constraints. Furthermore, computing a few leading principal components is usually sufficient for visualising the structure of a pedigree. Results We present the open-access R package for rapid pedigree PCA using sparse matrices. Our rapid pedigree PCA builds on the fact that matrix-vector multiplications with the additive relationship matrix can be carried out implicitly using the extremely sparse inverse relationship factor, $$\varvec{L}^{-1}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>L</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:math> , which can be directly obtained from a given pedigree. We implemented two methods. Randomised singular value decomposition tends to be faster when very few principal components are requested, and Eigen decomposition via the library tends to be faster when more principal components are of interest. On simulated data, our package delivers a speed-up greater than 10,000 times compared to naive PCA. It further enables analyses that are impossible with naive PCA. When only two principal components are desired, the randomised PCA method can half the running time required compared to , which we demonstrate by analysing the pedigree of the UK Kennel Club registered Labrador Retriever population of almost 1.5 million individuals. Conclusions The leading principal components of pedigree matrices can be efficiently obtained using randomised singular value decomposition and other methods. Scatter plots of these scores allow for intuitive visualisation of large pedigrees. For large pedigrees, this is considerably faster than rendering plots of a pedigree graph.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.807
Threshold uncertainty score0.532

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it