Concussion Disrupts Sleep in Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Concussions significantly impact sleep quality among adolescents. Despite increasing recognition of these effects, the complex relationship between adolescent concussions and sleep disturbances is still not fully understood and presents mixed findings. Here, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess how concussions affect sleep-related symptoms in adolescents. We included papers presenting Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) differences following concussion in high school and collegiate patients, with sleep measures recorded following concussion. Animal studies, research on participants with conditions other than concussion, non-English articles and papers failing to present PSQI data were excluded. We searched MEDLINE®, Embase®, CINAHL, Web of Science™, PsycINFO®, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases until 23 August 2024. In addition, we performed hand-searching of relevant reference lists and conference proceedings to identify further studies. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale. In total, we considered 4477 studies, with nine meeting the inclusion criteria. Our analysis involved 796 participants, 340 of whom had experienced a concussion. Analysis was carried out using the meta and metafor packages in R (version 4.0.0). We showed a deterioration in sleep quality post-concussion, as evidenced by increased PSQI (standardised mean difference 0.84; 95% CI 0.53–1.16; p < 0.0001). Subgroup and quality assessments confirmed the consistency of these findings. Since poor sleep quality impacts daytime activities, we analysed the relationship between concussion and daytime dysfunction. We showed that concussion is associated with a significant worsening of the daytime dysfunction score by 0.55 (95% CI 0.24–0.70; p = 0.006). We conclude that concussions impair both sleep quality and daytime functioning in adolescents. Our research underscores the need for systematic inclusion of sleep quality assessments in post-concussion protocols and calls for targeted interventions to manage sleep disturbances post-concussion to mitigate their broader impacts on daily functioning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.027 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.017 | 0.034 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".