MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413812704 · doi:10.4171/owr/2025/1

Graph Theory

2025· article· en· W4413812704 on OpenAlex
Vida Dujmović, Daniel Král͏̌, Alex Scott

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueOberwolfach Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Graph Theory Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersAir Force Office of Scientific ResearchEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilGeorgia Institute of TechnologyNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of OntarioGeorgia State UniversityNational Science Foundation
KeywordsGraph theoryComputer scienceGraphFocus (optics)Theoretical computer scienceMathematicsCombinatoricsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The workshop provided a venue for discussing several recent major developments in graph theory, with a primary focus on results concerning the notion of twin-width and hereditary properties of graphs. Both areas have seen a very rapid development recently, as reflected in the many results presented during the workshop. In addition to many interesting talks spanning the whole breadth of graph theory, the workshop also offered valuable collaboration opportunities, which also engaged early career researchers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.945
Threshold uncertainty score0.550

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it