MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413813856 · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2025.04.005

Adaptive Spatiotemporal Thermal Model for Real-Time Temperature Prediction in Directed Energy Deposition

2025· article· en· W4413813856 on OpenAlex
Kezi Li, Xiaoliang Jin, Ryozo Nagamune

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia CIRP · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDeposition (geology)ThermalEnergy (signal processing)Computer scienceEnvironmental scienceMaterials scienceMeteorologyGeologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Directed Energy Deposition (DED) is an advanced metal additive manufacturing process involving complex thermal dynamics that significantly impact the quality and structural integrity of fabricated components. Effective thermal management in DED requires accurate and real-time temperature predictions throughout the workpiece. However, traditional simulation methods often lack the computational efficiency necessary for real-time control applications. In this study, we introduce a novel physics-based, data-driven, and control-oriented spatiotemporal thermal model featuring adaptive meshing to enhance real-time temperature prediction accuracy and control performance. The proposed model dynamically refines the computational mesh in regions with steep thermal gradients and progressively coarsens it in areas experiencing relatively stable thermal conditions as additional deposition layers are built, substantially reducing computational requirements. Model validation against high-fidelity finite difference (FD) simulations shows mean absolute percentage errors ranging from 5.56% to 8.30% across multiple deposition layers of the entire component, and from 3.77% to 6.25% in regions near the melt pool characterized by steep thermal gradients. Remarkably, the model completed temperature predictions for five deposition layers in just 33.7 seconds, significantly faster than the 545.9 seconds required by FD simulations and well within the total printing time of 101.4 seconds, demonstrating suitability for real-time control applications. The developed framework offers a robust, scalable, and computationally efficient solution for thermal management in DED, potentially enhancing closed-loop control capabilities and promoting broader industrial adoption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.349
Threshold uncertainty score0.563

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it