A Mean Field Poisson–Boltzmann Theory Assessment of Copper Oxide Nanosheets Interaction Potential in Physiological Fluids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent times, copper oxide nanosheets (CONSs) have shown a broad spectrum of industrial uses due to their unique properties, including high electrical conductivity, surface-enhanced catalytic activity, etc. Therefore, industrial processes involved in their manufacture can give rise to airborne particulates. Several in vivo studies have reported toxicity of these nanoparticles due to their interactions with biological molecules. Generally, literature-based assessment of their toxicity has centered on experimental findings. In this paper, we report for the first time, trend in CONSs interactions in intracellular and extracellular fluids, using the Nonlinear Mean Field Poisson-Boltzmann theory. Our theoretical prediction for zeta potential in the extracellular fluid environment align with published values in the literature. Based on this theoretical approach, we also demonstrate that double layer disjoining pressure due to interacting double layers of CONSs is generally higher in intracellular fluids. The findings of our theoretical approach highlight the importance of predicting the extent of cellular uptake potential of CONSs in organs that are prone to such airborne environmental particulates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".