Effects of Drying Methods on Drying Characteristics and Physicochemical Quality of Turnip Slices (Brassica rapa L.)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To identify the optimal drying methods for turnip slices, vacuum freeze-drying (VFD), air impingement drying (AID), infrared-assisted hot air drying (IR-HAD), and conventional hot air drying (HAD) were evaluated. The physicochemical properties of dried samples were comprehensively assessed under varied drying conditions. The results demonstrated that AID achieved the shortest drying time (240 min). At identical temperatures, AID samples exhibited significantly lower total color difference (ΔE) compared with IR-HAD and HAD, alongside superior retention of total phenols and enhanced antioxidant activity. VFD yielded the highest quality attributes, including optimal rehydration capacity, maximal phenol retention, and the strongest antioxidant activity (DPPH: 16.56 ± 0.26 μmol Trolox/g; FRAP: 13.99 ± 0.04 μmol Trolox/g). SEM analysis revealed that VFD produced a loose, porous microstructure, explaining its enhanced rehydration. Overall, both AID (efficiency) and VFD (quality) show promise for industrial turnip processing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".