MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413818531 · doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109782

Microclimate, soil moisture and forage yield vary spatially within a temperate tree-based intercropping system: From competition to facilitation

2025· article· en· W4413818531 on OpenAlexafffund
E. Hebert, Marc‐Olivier Martin‐Guay, Audrey Maheu, Marie‐Noëlle Thivierge, David Rivest

Bibliographic record

VenueAgricultural Water Management · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgroforestry and silvopastoral systems
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
FundersMinistère de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'Alimentation
KeywordsIntercroppingMicroclimateTemperate climateEnvironmental scienceCompetition (biology)ForageFacilitationAgronomyAgroforestryEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tree-based intercropping (TBI) can improve water conservation in agroecosystems and yield stability in the face of climate change. Greater understanding is required regarding mechanisms determining spatial and seasonal variation in moisture availability and agricultural yields in TBI systems. Our two-year study assessed spatiotemporal dynamics of soil hydraulic properties, microclimatic conditions, soil moisture and forage performance (yield, nutritive value) with increasing distances from tree rows (0, 4, 12, 20 m) within a TBI system (50 trees ha −1 ; 10- to 11-years-old) and in agricultural controls. TBI rows included hybrid poplars that were inter-planted with high-value hardwoods. In each block (n = 3), the TBI system and control were divided in two: with vs without root-pruning (0.75 m depth using a sub-soiler). Increased soil organic matter and infiltration rate, and decreased bulk density were measured in the TBI compared to the control, but only under trees (0 m). We observed increased soil moisture near the centre of the alleys (12 and 20 m) during both extremes of water availability, likely due to measured wind speed reductions. Under high potential evaporation, atmospheric evaporative demand near the alley centres was lower than in the control. Moisture, light availability and forage yield close to tree rows (4 m) were lower than those near alley centres and in the control. Tree root pruning increased soil moisture and yield at 4 m from the tree row, but not completely to control levels, indicating that forage was limited by light and water availability at the tree-crop interface. Unlike alfalfa, yield of grasses was not negatively influenced by tree competition. Our study suggests that TBI systems can potentially improve hydrological responses of agroecosystems to extreme weather events. This potential of TBI systems appears highly useful given expected increases in the frequency and intensity of moisture deficits and extreme rainfall events.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.888
Threshold uncertainty score0.398

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAgricultural Water ManagementSame topicAgroforestry and silvopastoral systemsFrench-language works237,207