eSlice: Elastic Inter-Slice Resource Allocation for Smart City Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Network slicing is a fundamental enabler for the advancement of fifth generation (5G) and beyond 5G (B5G) networks, offering customized service-level agreements (SLAs) for distinct slices such as enhanced mobile broadband (eMBB), massive machine-type communications (mMTC), and ultra-reliable low-latency communication (URLLC). However, smart city applications often require multiple slices concurrently, posing significant challenges in resource allocation, service isolation, and maintaining performance guarantees. This paper presents eSlice, an elastic inter-slice resource allocation mechanism specifically designed to address the dynamic requirements of smart city applications. eSlice organizes applications into hierarchical slices, leveraging cloud-native resource scaling to dynamically adapt to real-time demands. It integrates two novel algorithms: the Proactive eSlice Allocation Algorithm (PeSAA), which ensures the fair distribution of resources across the substrate network, and the Reactive eSlice Allocation Algorithm (ReSAA), which employs Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) to dynamically coordinate, reallocate, and recover unused resources as network conditions evolve. Experimental results demonstrate that eSlice significantly outperforms existing methods, achieving 94.3% resource utilization in simulation-based experiments under constrained urban-scale scenarios, providing a robust solution for dynamic resource management in 5G-enabled smart city networks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".