MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413824701 · doi:10.3390/axioms14090668

The Classical Origin of Spin: Vectors Versus Bivectors

2025· article· en· W4413824701 on OpenAlexaff
Bryan Sanctuary

Bibliographic record

VenueAxioms · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRelativity and Gravitational Theory
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpin (aerodynamics)PhysicsTheoretical physicsMathematicsMaterials scienceThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There are two ways of linearizing the Klein–Gordon equation: Dirac’s choice, which introduces a matter–antimatter pair, and a second approach using a bivector, which Dirac did not consider. In this paper, we show that a bivector provides the classical origin of quantum spin. At high precessional frequencies, a symmetry transformation occurs in which classical reflection becomes quantum parity. We identify a classical spin-1 boson and demonstrate how bosons deliver energy, matter, and torque to a surface. The correspondence between classical and quantum domains allows spin to be identified as a quantum bivector, iσ. Using geometric algebra, we show that a classical boson has two blades, corresponding to magnetic quantum number states m=±1. We conclude that fermions are the blades of bosons, thereby unifying both into a single particle theory. We compare and contrast the Standard Model, which uses chiral vectors as fundamental, with the Bivector Standard Model, which uses bivectors, with two hands, as fundamental.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.286
Threshold uncertainty score0.163

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAxiomsSame topicRelativity and Gravitational TheoryFrench-language works237,207