MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413824707 · doi:10.3390/fractalfract9090569

Federated Learning Detection of Cyberattacks on Virtual Synchronous Machines Under Grid-Forming Control Using Physics-Informed LSTM

2025· article· en· W4413824707 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Khaleghi, Soroush Oshnoei, Saeed Mirzajani

Bibliographic record

VenueFractal and Fractional · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Security and Resilience
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGridControl (management)Computer scienceComputer securityHuman–computer interactionArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The global shift toward clean production, like using renewable energy, has significantly decreased the use of synchronous machines (SMs), which help maintain stability and control, causing serious frequency stability issues in power systems with low inertia. Fractional order controller-based virtual synchronous machines (FOC-VSMs) have become a promising option, but they rely on communication networks to work together in real time, causing them to be at risk of cyberattacks, especially from false data injection attacks (FDIAs). This paper suggests a new way to detect FDI attacks using a federated physics-informed long short-term memory (PI-LSTM) network. Each FOC-VSM uses its data to train a PI-LSTM, which keeps the information private but still helps it learn from a common model that understands various operating conditions. The PI-LSTM incorporates physical constraints derived from the FOC-VSM swing equation, facilitating residual-based anomaly detection that is sensitive to minor deviations in control dynamics, such as altered inertia or falsified frequency signals. Unlike traditional LSTMs, the physics-informed architecture minimizes false positives arising from benign disturbances. We assessed the proposed method on an IEEE 9-bus test system featuring two FOC-VSMs. The results show that our method can successfully detect FDI attacks while handling regular changes, proving it could be a strong solution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFractal and FractionalSame topicSmart Grid Security and ResilienceFrench-language works237,207