MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413826535 · doi:10.1177/08830738251369139

Developmental Epileptic Encephalopathy in a Pediatric Patient: Insights from a Novel <i>SULT4A1</i> Variant and Genetic Challenges

2025· article· en· W4413826535 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Bdair, Orabi Hajjeh, Muhammad Takhman, Maram M. Abukhalil, Fathi Milhem, Ahmed Abushama

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Child Neurology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Canadian institutionsKingston General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExome sequencingPenetranceSiblingEpilepsyGlobal developmental delayGenetic counselingGenetic testingMedicineDystoniaPsychologyPediatricsMutationGeneticsPsychiatryBiologyDevelopmental psychologyPhenotypeInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Developmental epileptic encephalopathy (DEE) in children presents significant diagnostic and management challenges. Advances in whole-exome sequencing (WES) have enabled the identification of rare genetic variants, offering new insights into these complex conditions. Here, we report a 2.5-year-old girl with refractory epilepsy and DEE, in whom WES revealed a novel homozygous SULT4A1 splice-site variant. Although the SULT4A1 variant likely contributed to her condition, the later emergence of motor and speech delay in a sibling with the same mutation suggests variable expressivity or age-dependent onset, rather than incomplete penetrance. The patient partially responded to immunotherapy but continued to experience breakthrough seizures and developmental delays, highlighting the challenges in managing such disorders. This case underscores the importance of genetic testing, functional studies, and genetic counseling in the diagnosis and treatment of rare neurodevelopmental disorders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Child NeurologySame topicGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersFrench-language works237,207