MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413833334 · doi:10.7306/gq.1798

Laser ablation ICP-MS study of trace elements in scheelite in different types of mineralization from the Bohemian Massif

2025· article· en· W4413833334 on OpenAlexaff
Jan Pašava, Petr Bohdálek, Jan Malec, F. Veselovský, Ana Carolina R. Miranda, Georges Beaudoin, Bertrand Rottier

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Quarterly · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMineralogy and Gemology Studies
Canadian institutionsCentre de Géomatique du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMassifGeologyMineralization (soil science)GeochemistryScheeliteMineralogyLaser ablationLaserChemistryTungsten

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe scheelite in five types of mineral deposit from the Bohemian Massif (greisen, orogenic Au, reduced intrusion-related gold systems (RIRGS), oxidized and reduced skarn) via cathodoluminescence (CL) imaging and laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) analyses. We document variability in the scheelite composition within single grains and/or deposit types that reflects the nature and evolution of the ore-forming fluids. We provide scheelite typical trace element characteristics and chondrite-normalized REE patterns for different deposit types, confirming that scheelite can be used as an indicator mineral for their exploration. For example, scheelite from greisen-related deposits is usually rich in Sn, Sr, Y and HREE with various ranges of median values in individual deposits (0.05–8.0 ppm, 232.4–567.1 ppm, 0.06–465.0 ppm and 0.06–632.5 ppm, respectively) and with typical chondrite-normalized REE patterns showing Eu negative or positive anomaly. Under UV light scheelite from Sn-W deposits displays variable colours from whitish via yellowish to bluish. In contrast to greisen-related deposits, scheelite from Au-orogenic association is usually relative rich in Pb (median range in individual deposits: 6.1–11.2 ppm), and relatively poor in Mg, Mo and Nb. Flat and bell-type chondrite-normalized REE patterns show a pronounced Eu positive anomaly. Under UV light it is predominantly homogenous and bluish. Scheelite from oxidized skarn is enriched in Mo, Nb and ΣLREE (median range in individual deposits: 311.4–7214.1 ppm, 1.3–214.9 ppm, and 1.1–1375.8 ppm, respectively), and scheelite from reduced skarns is characterized by the lowest median ranges of Nb (1.7–107.8 ppm), Y (0.69–41.1 ppm), Mn (0.5–17.0 ppm) and Zn (0.04–0.252 ppm) in individual deposits, when compared to all the groups studied. Scheelite from oxidized and reduced skarn deposits displays several types of chondrite-normalized pattern: (1) LREE-enriched with a positive or negative Eu anomaly, (2) Bell-shaped REE patterns with negative or without Eu anomaly, and (3) Flat REE patterns with a negative Eu anomaly. Scheelite from oxidized and reduced skarn deposits is commonly zoned and mostly bluish under UV light.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological QuarterlySame topicMineralogy and Gemology StudiesFrench-language works237,207