Bibliographic record
Abstract
Residual stresses are common in rod-like plant organs such as roots and shoots, arising from mechanical incompatibilities between tissues with differing intrinsic lengths. Although mechanical regulation of cell wall growth is well established, the role of internally generated stresses in organ-scale morphogenesis remains poorly understood. Here, we introduce a tractable theoretical framework that couples structural residual stresses to growth-driven shape dynamics. We represent rod-like organs as bundles of morphoelastic rods connected in parallel, each corresponding to a distinct concentric tissue layer. Assuming elastic strain-driven growth and rod-like symmetry, the resulting mechanical constraints yield transparent analytical relationships linking tissue heterogeneity to macroscopic observables such as axial strain rates, bending dynamics, and residual stress distributions. Using a minimal two-layer model representing the epidermis and inner tissues, we show how tissue incompatibilities can generate phenomena including effective autotropism, mechanical memory, and discontinuous growth dynamics following cell division. Overall, our framework demonstrates how residual stresses may contribute to plant morphogenesis and provides a foundation for future investigations of mechano-chemical growth control in plants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".