MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413834752 · doi:10.1111/eva.70136

Virulence Evolution: Thinking Outside of the Host

2025· article· en· W4413834752 on OpenAlexaff
Luís M. Silva, Jacob C. Koella

Bibliographic record

VenueEvolutionary Applications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEvolution and Genetic Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
KeywordsVirulenceBiologyHost (biology)Parasite hostingContext (archaeology)Anopheles gambiaeTransmission (telecommunications)Experimental evolutionZoologyEcologyGeneticsGeneMalariaImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The main theory of the evolution of virulence relies on a trade‐off between virulence and transmission rate. However, it has been difficult to measure the required trade‐off. A recent transmission decomposition framework explains that this might be partly due to a lack of information about the parasite's survival in the environment outside its hosts, where the parasite finds itself during transmission to its next host. In this study, we used parasite lines of the microsporidian Vavraia culicis with varying levels of virulence upon infecting their host, the mosquito Anopheles gambiae , to explore the interaction between parasite‐driven virulence within its host and its survival outside of the host. The parasite lines with greater virulence and growth within their hosts had a cost in their intrinsic ability to withstand the environment, irrespective of temperature. These results underscore the importance of considering the full context of transmission and other parasite fitness traits in studying and predicting the evolution and spread of infectious diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.937
Threshold uncertainty score0.349

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEvolutionary ApplicationsSame topicEvolution and Genetic DynamicsFrench-language works237,207