MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413834941 · doi:10.24908/iqurcp18790

Bio-Inspired Polarization Compass

2025· article· en· W4413834941 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Benjamin Potter

Bibliographic record

VenueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topicsolar cell performance optimization
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompassPolarization (electrochemistry)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceGeographyCartographyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many emerging technologies like autonomous driving, robotic agriculture, and drone control promise to improve safety and efficiency in multiple sectors, however they require high-precision navigation systems which are currently insufficient. Existing navigation approaches rely on the global navigational satellite system (GNSS) that is prone to failure when satellite connection is unavailable. GNSS signal loss occurs in dense urban areas, which makes vehicle localization a challenge. Perhaps more problematically, jamming devices that block GNSS signals are becoming increasingly accessible. These inherent problems have pushed researchers to investigate methods of augmenting GNSS navigation with additional sensors to improve its precision and robustness. One such augmentation is inspired by the biology of the desert ant. This ant uses adaptations in its eyes to extract navigational cues from polarized skylight. When light from the sun hits the atmosphere, it generates a uniform polarization pattern that can be used to develop and maintain a navigational plan. Our work begins by constructing a polarization compass (PC) from the biological insights found in the desert ant. We then consider three algorithms for extracting navigational cues from the skylight polarization pattern captured by the PC: Hough transform (HT), support vector machine (SVM), and linear regression (LR). We demonstrate that PC provides a heading estimation that is accurate to less than 1 degree, which is better than existing magnetic compasses. Our work shows that PC is an attractive augmentation for GNSS-based systems which may improve their performance under adverse conditions. In future work, the PC will be integrated with other sensors, including GNSS, to assess its performance under realistic conditions. This will be carried out in both terrestrial and aerial domains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.916
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference ProceedingsSame topicsolar cell performance optimizationFrench-language works237,207