MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413838189 · doi:10.1115/1.4069581

A Novel Reduced-Order Mathematical Model for Radial Turbines

2025· article· en· W4413838189 on OpenAlexaff
Katherine E. Powers, Jamie Archer, Colin Copeland

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTurbomachinery Performance and Optimization
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersCummins Incorporated
KeywordsOrder (exchange)Computer scienceEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Radial turbines are commonly used to extract otherwise unused energy from engine exhausts, and are therefore an important component of many emission reducing technologies. There is a desire to quickly and reliably predict the performance of radial turbines over a variety of different operating conditions. Reduced-order models meet the computational speed requirements but often do not obtain sufficient accuracy without the tuning of multiple unknown parameters. In order for a model to be predictive, we need a way to reduce the number of unknowns and find ways to calibrate these parameters to known geometric values. In this paper, we develop a new reduced-order model from first principles by averaging the fundamental Navier–Stokes equations of fluid motion. All losses are derived from the deviatoric stress tensor to ensure consistency. Only four unknown parameters are required, each with a physical interpretation and showing evidence of universality. The model simulates gas properties throughout the turbine, shows the loss distribution over the operating range, and predicts turbine performance curves. Validation is provided by a remarkable fit to experimental data. Therefore, this model has the potential to become a valuable tool for turbine manufacturers during early design stages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.666
Threshold uncertainty score0.562

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and PowerSame topicTurbomachinery Performance and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207