MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413838542 · doi:10.24908/iqurcp19887

Design and Validation of a High-Pressure CO₂ Electrocatalysis System

2025· article· en· W4413838542 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Samuel Beylerian

Bibliographic record

VenueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicCO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHigh pressureElectrocatalystComputer scienceChemistryEngineeringEngineering physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-pressure carbon dioxide (CO₂) electrocatalysis is a promising pathway for reducing greenhouse gas emissions while producing valuable fuels and chemicals. Elevated pressures improve CO₂ solubility and reaction rates, yet most existing systems are limited to ambient conditions. Few setups support high-pressure CO₂ electrocatalysis with liquid diffusion cathodes, creating a need for new infrastructure. The objective of this work was to design and assemble a system capable of enabling high-pressure CO₂ electrocatalysis. The setup integrates a custom-designed stainless steel pressure vessel rated above 12 bar, chemically inert PTFE tubing, high-pressure compatible pumps, and a back-pressure regulator to safely return products to atmospheric conditions for gas chromatography (GC) analysis. Stress calculations confirmed high safety margins, with factors of safety exceeding 40 in some components. To minimize cost and maintain flexibility, the vessel was custom-fabricated, and soft tubing was incorporated to allow for different system configurations. These design choices ensured durability while avoiding contamination that could compromise electrochemical measurements. A simpler system modelling solely the anode portion was first validated with water and nitrogen, successfully operating at 5 bar, limited by pump capacity, but designed to accommodate higher pressure-rated pumps. Safety and robustness were demonstrated, and the setup maintained stability while remaining adaptable for future modifications. While the pressure vessel is less flexible due to high-pressure constraints, the modularity of other components provides significant room for customization and scaling. This work establishes a practical foundation for future high-pressure CO₂ electrocatalysis studies. By enabling experiments at industrially relevant conditions, the system supports research toward improved efficiency, selectivity, and scalability, moving closer to making CO₂ electrocatalysis a viable approach for carbon mitigation and renewable fuel production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference ProceedingsSame topicCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsFrench-language works237,207