MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4413838781 · doi:10.24908/iqurcp19866

Analysis of gravity disturbance data for the detection of crustal-scale structures: insights from central Italy and surrounding regions

2025· article· en· W4413838781 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Lillian Cybulski, Laurent Godin, Lyal B. Harris

Bibliographic record

VenueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDisturbance (geology)GeologyScale (ratio)GeodesySeismologyGeophysicsRemote sensingGeographyPaleontologyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

North-central Italy is cored by the Apennines mountains, which are the product of Cenozoic convergence between the Adriatic microplate and the European plate. The Apennines display complex lateral variations in surface geology, some of which could be associated with a postulated yet controversial tear in the subducting Adriatic lithosphere. This research uses spectrally filtered World Gravity Model (WGM) 2012 gravity disturbance data to highlight linear changes in the data at different inferred depths, interpreted as proxies for location of crustal-scale geological structures. Gravity “worms” (multiscale wavelet edges of the gravity disturbance data) are used to supplement lineament interpretation and emphasize structural contacts. Results show that while the lineament characteristics vary at three different depth intervals (~2-25 km, ~25-50 km, and >50 km), certain major lineaments are continuously expressed. The study area is additionally subdivided into five major domains corresponding to different dominant orientations of the gravity lineaments. The lineament patterns within the domains likely highlight major structures in regions that experienced contrasting tectonic evolutions leading up to the present-day configuration. Furthermore, the gravity lineaments at all three inferred depth slices tend to show a spatial correlation with major lithological boundaries. Gravity lineaments at the shallow depth slice spatially correlate with surficial features such as the edges of Neogene-Quaternary sedimentary basins, topographic ridges in the surrounding Tyrrhenian, Ligurian, and Adriatic seas, as well as geomorphological features in the Northern Apennines. The lineaments in the shallow and intermediate depth slices tend to align with major thrust faults across the study area, as well as with transverse lineaments that have been well-documented in the northern Apennines. The lineaments in the deepest slice appear to align with seismicity patterns. Finally, a set of gravity lineaments, imaged across all three depth slices, is consistent with the location of the postulated subduction tear in the Northern Apennines, thereby supporting this hypothesis. Our results suggest that analysis of lineament patterns from gravity disturbance data is a powerful tool to detect lithospheric-scale structures and identify domains that can provide insight into the tectonic evolution of a complex area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings→Same topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques→French-language works237,207→