MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413846603 · doi:10.1016/j.polar.2025.101264

Neoproterozoic to Cambrian granitoids of northern Mozambique and Dronning Maud Land Antarctica: Implications for the assembly of Gondwana

2025· article· en· W4413846603 on OpenAlex
G.H. Grantham, P.H. Macey, Malcolm P. Roberts, B.A. Ingram, Richard Armstrong, Kazuyuki Shiraishi, Tomokazu Hokada, B. M. Eglington, Petrus le Roux, Grácio Cune

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePolar Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNational Research Foundation
KeywordsGondwanaGeologyPaleontologyPhysical geographyTectonicsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The field relationships, petrography, whole rock major, trace element and radiogenic isotope chemistry and geochronology of Cambrian Granites granites from the Nampula Terrane (NT) Mozambique are reported. These data are compared with published data from Neoproterozoic to Cambrian granites from Central Dronning Land (CDML). Age comparisons include data from the Cabo Delgado/Namuno Terrane of northern Mozambique (CDNMT). Whereas there is significant overlap in the chemistry and ages of the granites from the NT, compared to those from CDML and CDNMT, indicating their possible genesis within the same broad orogenic event, subtle differences in mineralogy, chemistry and age are seen. These differences include subsolvus peraluminous mica-dominated granites with ages < ∼ 530 Ma in all three areas but concentrated in the NT, in contrast to dominantly metaluminous hypersolvus charnockitic syenogranites with ages > ∼ 530 Ma in CDML and CDTNM, but absent from the NT and western Sverdrupfjella. The differences between the two granite varieties are inferred to reflect differences in tectonic setting during genesis, with the marginally older CDML and CDTNM granites/charnockites resulting from decompression dehydration melting, dominantly of amphibole in the hanging wall of a mega-nappe. In contrast the marginally younger NT granites were generated dominantly from dehydration melting of mica in the footwall of the mega-nappe structure. Geophysical data indicate the thickened crust underlying the mega nappe in DML extends far in to Antarctica indicating much of East Antarctica may be underlain by allochthonous crust.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it