MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413848559 · doi:10.2147/dddt.s536225

Effect of Ciprofol on Postoperative Cognitive Function in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery with Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial

2025· article· en· W4413848559 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDrug Design Development and Therapy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGuizhou Medical UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCardiopulmonary bypassMedicineRandomized controlled trialCardiac surgeryProspective cohort studyAnesthesiaSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: To investigate the effects of ciprofol on postoperative cognitive function in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Patients and Methods: A total of 138 patients who underwent cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass were included in this prospective, randomized, controlled study. Patients were randomized into two groups: the Ciprofol group (Group C) and the Propofol group (Group P). During anesthesia induction and maintenance, the patients in Group C received ciprofol, whereas those in Group P received propofol. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of postoperative delirium (POD), which was assessed twice daily for 7 days after surgery via either the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) or the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). Statistical analyses included chi-square tests for categorical outcomes and relative risk calculations for POD. Additionally, delirium subtypes were recorded. The incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) was evaluated at 1 and 3 months after surgery using the Telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment (T-MoCA). Furthermore, the occurrence of postinduction adverse events, including hypotension, bradycardia, and tachycardia, as well as the incidence of postoperative complications, were also documented. Results: POD occurred in 19/64 (29.69%) patients in the Ciprofol group and 34/65 (52.31%) patients in the Propofol group (RR = 0.57; 95% confidence interval = 0.37 to 0.88; p = 0.009). There was no significant difference in the incidence of POCD at 1 month (22.03% vs 26.62%, p = 0.547) or 3 months (16.25% vs 16.00%; p = 0.771) after surgery between the two groups. Conclusion: Ciprofol was found to decrease the incidence of POD in patients who underwent cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Nevertheless, no significant effect of this intervention on the incidence of POCD was demonstrated at either 1 or 3 months after surgery. A reduction in the incidence of delirium may be associated with improved postoperative recovery, shortened hospital stays, and a decrease in long-term cognitive impairments. Registration: The study had been registered in the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry ( www.chictr.org.cn ; Trial Identifier: ChiCTR2200061712). Keywords: ciprofol, cardiopulmonary bypass, cardiac surgery, delirium, cognitive function

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.888

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it