MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413854515 · doi:10.1016/j.metop.2025.100391

Vitamin D3 supplementation in women practicing orthodox religious and intermittent fasting: A controlled study with formulation-specific effects

2025· article· en· W4413854515 on OpenAlexaff
Spyridon Ν. Karras, Konstantinos Michalakis, Maria Kypraiou, Antonios Vlastos, Marios Anemoulis, Zadalla Mouslech, Filotas Talidis, Costas Haitoglou, Evangelos Papanikolaou, Neoklis A. Georgopoulos, Georgios Tzimagiorgis

Bibliographic record

VenueMetabolism Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVitamin D Research Studies
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVitaminIntermittent fastingMedicineInternal medicineEndocrinologyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Vitamin D deficiency is prevalent among monastic Orthodox populations, likely due to their sartorial habits and religious fasting rules. Data on supplementation in similar populations are lacking, including responses in restoring vitamin D sufficiency and to specific formulations of vitamin D supplements. This controlled study evaluated the efficacy of a daily oral vitamin D regimen, using oil-based drops and tablets, in restoring vitamin D status in a population of Orthodox nuns from Northern Greece, as well as assessing potential formulation-specific effects in the context of vitamin D supplementation. Methods: A total of 41 Orthodox nuns practicing intermittent fasting received a daily dose of 2.500 IU vitamin D3 in either oil-based drops or tablets for 16 weeks and were compared to 40 matched controls without supplementation. Serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], parathyroid hormone (PTH), calcium, and albumin were measured at baseline and after 16 weeks in both groups. Results: In the supplemented group, mean serum 25(OH)D concentrations increased significantly from 21.44 ± 9.08 ng/mL to 34.27 ± 10.33 ng/mL (p = 0.022), while PTH decreased from 66.18 ± 21.31 pg/mL to 50.71 ± 15.92 pg/mL (p = 0.018). The control group showed no significant changes in either 25(OH)D (23.90 ± 7.11 vs. 26.53 ± 9.14 ng/mL, p = 0.067) or PTH (41.75 ± 15.74 vs. 40.11 ± 13.56 pg/mL, p = 0.415). Multivariate regression-adjusting for baseline 25(OH)D, BMI, and body fat percentage-indicated that the form of supplementation (tablet vs. drops) was not an independent predictor of the change in vitamin D concentrations (β = +2.77, p = 0.456). The only statistically significant predictor was baseline 25(OH)D (β = -0.63, p < 0.001). Conclusions: A daily regimen of oral vitamin D3, administered as either drops or tablets, is effective in significantly improving vitamin D status and reducing PTH concentrations in women adhering to intermittent fasting religious practices. These findings support targeted supplementation strategies in at-risk fasting populations, particularly those with vitamin D deficiency, regardless of the form of oral supplementation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.175
Threshold uncertainty score0.605

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMetabolism OpenSame topicVitamin D Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207