MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413856506 · doi:10.1093/noajnl/vdaf166.051

55 INSIGHTS INTO MENINGIOMA BIOLOGY AND RADIOTHERAPY RESPONSE THROUGH MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION OF RTOG-0539 CLINICAL TRIAL

2025· article· en· W4413856506 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Leeor S. Yefet, A P Landry, James Z. Wang, Jin Liu, Vikas Patil, Chloe Gui, Yosef Ellenbogen, Andrew Ajisebutu, Farshad Nassiri, Gelareh Zadeh

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology Advances · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMeningioma and schwannoma management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadiation therapyMeningiomaCharacterization (materials science)Clinical trialMedicineMedical physicsComputational biologyBiologyInternal medicinePathologyNanotechnologyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Brain Tumour Foundation of Canada Travel Award Recipient BACKGROUND Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial tumors. Radiotherapy (RT) is an adjunct treatment following surgical resection, but response varies. RTOG-0539 is the first prospective phase 2 clinical trial to stratify patients into risk groups for adjuvant RT, establishing key benchmarks for RT outcomes. This study provides the first molecular characterization of an RT clinical trial in meningiomas to identify biological insights into RT response and tumor behavior. METHODS Tumor tissue from 100meningioma patients enrolled in the RTOG-0539 trial was analyzed using DNA methylation profiling, RNA sequencing, and whole-exome sequencing. Copy number variations, mutational landscapes, and gene expression patterns were examined to identify molecular correlates of tumor aggressiveness and RT response. Consensus pathway analysis was performed to determine biological processes associated with differential RT sensitivity. RESULTS High-risk meningiomas demonstrated significant cell cycle dysregulation and upregulation of hypermetabolic pathways. Specific genomic alterations, including 1p loss and 1q gain, were associated with aggressive tumor behavior. Co-occurrence of NF2 and non-NF2 mutations was identified in select high-risk cases, suggesting distinct molecular subgroups. Notably, molecular profiling led to reclassification of several tumors, revealing discrepancies between histopathologic grading and underlying biology. CONCLUSION This is the first study to comprehensively define the molecular landscape of meningiomas treated with RT in a prospective clinical trial. Multi-omic integration refined risk stratification beyond histopathologic grading, with implications for genomically guided treatment strategies. These findings align with ongoing precision medicine trials and emphasize the importance of prospective tumor banking to facilitate biomarker-driven approaches in meningioma management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.790
Threshold uncertainty score0.622

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.376 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology AdvancesSame topicMeningioma and schwannoma managementFrench-language works237,207