MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413857222 · doi:10.2196/73408

A Novel Approach Using Serious Game Data to Predict the WISC-V Processing Speed Index in Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Machine Learning Study

2025· article· en· W4413857222 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
J. Y. Kim, Seung‐Jae Kim, Jin-Yeop Park, Hyang‐Sook Hoe, Jeong-Heon Song

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Serious Games · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreprintPsychologyAttention deficit hyperactivity disorderIndex (typography)Wechsler Intelligence Scale for ChildrenAttention deficit disorderArtificial intelligenceDevelopmental psychologyCognitive psychologyComputer scienceClinical psychologyIntelligence quotientPsychiatryWorld Wide WebCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The processing speed index (PSI) of the Korean Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fifth Edition (K-WISC-V) is highly correlated with symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and is an important indicator of cognitive function. However, restrictions on the frequency of testing prevent short-term PSI assessments. An accessible, objective technique for predicting PSI scores would enable better short-term monitoring and intervention for children with ADHD. Objective: To enable objective and accessible monitoring of cognitive function beyond traditional clinical assessments, this study aimed to develop a machine learning model that predicts the PSI scores of children with ADHD using behavioral data from serious games. Methods: Sixty-eight children (6-13 y of age) with ADHD were recruited, and after excluding incomplete data, 59 participants were included in the final analysis. The participants completed an initial PSI assessment using the K-WISC-V followed by 25 minutes of engagement with serious game content. Data from the game sessions were used to train machine learning models, and the models' performance in predicting PSI scores was evaluated using the root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean absolute percent error (MAPE), with K-fold cross-validation (k=4) applied to ensure robustness. Results: Among the individual machine learning models, support vector regression (SVR) had the best performance, with the lowest RMSE of 11.288, MAE of 7.874, and MAPE of 7.375%. The best overall performance was achieved by the ensemble integrating AdaBoost, Elastic Net, and SVR, which recorded the lowest RMSE of 10.072, MAE of 6.798, and MAPE of 6.611%. The predictive accuracy of this ensemble model was highest for PSI scores near the mean value of 100, demonstrating its reliability for clinical applications. Conclusions: The developed PSI prediction model has the potential to serve as an objective and accessible tool for monitoring cognitive function in children with ADHD. As a complement to traditional assessments, this approach allows continuous tracking of symptom changes and can support more personalized treatment planning in both clinical and everyday settings, which may improve accessibility and adherence. However, the findings need to be validated in larger, more diverse populations, and the long-term feasibility of using serious games in clinical and educational settings must be further examined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Serious GamesSame topicAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderFrench-language works237,207