MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413859530 · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126983

Improving small urban wastewater treatment plants with a nature-based reactor for tertiary treatment

2025· article· en· W4413859530 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Lluís Bertrans-Tubau, Sergio Martínez-Campos, Julio C. López‐Doval, Meritxell Abril, Guillem Pladelasala-Rocafiguera, Sergio Ponsá, Ana Cristina Suñer, Victòria Salvadó, Manuela Hidalgo, Anna Doménech‐Pascual, Anna M. Romaní, Anna Pico-Tomàs, José Luís Balcázar, Lorenzo Proia

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Management · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicConstructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNextGenerationEUEuropean Social FundAgència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de RecercaGeneralitat de CatalunyaEuropean CommissionMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y UniversidadesMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
KeywordsSewage treatmentEnvironmental scienceWaste managementWastewaterEnvironmental engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Urban wastewater treatment has significantly improved in recent decades, reducing the environmental impacts of their effluents and improving the chemical and ecological status of receiving water bodies. However, specific treatments, focused on nitrogen and phosphorus removal, have been implemented principally in large urban wastewater treatment plants (UWWTPs) serving over 10,000 population equivalents (P.E). In contrast, small UWWTPs (<10,000 P.E.) are generally not required to meet nutrient discharge limits despite the revised Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive. Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) offer cost-effective alternatives for small facilities as potential tertiary treatments. This research evaluated a pond-stream system, based on the biological activity of benthic (biofilms) and planktonic microbial communities (biofilm-plankton reactor, BPR), as an additional treatment step for activated sludge UWWTPs. The BPR achieved removal efficiencies for nitrogen (67.4 ± 11.1 %) and Escherichia coli (75.4 ± 37.3 %), while phosphorus, carbon, and targeted contaminants of emerging concern were highly variable and were not consistently removed. Microbial communities' structure and functions were assessed through algal biomass, stoichiometry, and extracellular enzymatic activities, providing a distinctive perspective into the BPR's microbial ecological dynamics related to removal efficiencies. Shotgun metagenomics identified a broad range of nitrogen functional genes, mainly involved in biodegradation and biosynthesis processes. This next-generation sequencing approach complemented conventional E. coli count methods, offering a deeper understanding of potential pathogen hotspots in treated effluents. Overall, the BPR system demonstrated a promising NBS for nitrogen and microbiological contaminant removal in small UWWTPs, whereas further investigation is needed to optimise the removal of other important water quality parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Environmental ManagementSame topicConstructed Wetlands for Wastewater TreatmentFrench-language works237,207