Transition vers la formation postsecondaire de jeunes ayant des besoins éducatifs particuliers en Suisse : (re)défendre ses droits à l’accessibilité
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article s’appuie sur deux études qualitatives menées en Suisse auprès de vingt jeunes ayant des besoins éducatifs particuliers ainsi que de leurs parents. Il décrit et analyse les enjeux et les défis liés à la transition vers la formation postsecondaire pour ces jeunes. Différentes formes d’accessibilité posent question, comme l’accès à une formation postsecondaire ou à une formation certifiante ou le maintien et la mise en place de certains aménagements auxquels ces jeunes ont droit. L’article propose des pistes pour dépasser une vision encore très individuelle et compensatoire des besoins des jeunes et pour cheminer vers des pratiques plus universelles au niveau postsecondaire en Suisse.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".