L’inclusion des personnes étudiantes en situation de handicap au collégial sous l’angle des représentations sociales enseignantes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Avec l’augmentation du nombre de personnes étudiantes en situation de handicap en enseignement supérieur, le réseau collégial québécois a dû s’adapter à une diversité croissante de besoins, notamment liés aux situations de handicap invisible. Une équipe de recherche a exploré les représentations sociales des personnes enseignantes sur l’inclusion des personnes en situation de handicap ainsi que sur leurs rôles et responsabilités dans ce processus. Les résultats révèlent des perceptions positives, mais des distinctions persistent entre les représentations sociales des situations de handicap visible et invisible. Des résistances, surtout envers les pratiques évaluatives inclusives, demeurent. L’adoption de la conception universelle de l’apprentissage apparait comme une solution prometteuse pour répondre aux besoins de toute la population étudiante.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".