Pratiques inclusives dans les cours de 2e et 3e cycles universitaires : perceptions d’étudiantes et étudiants de l’international sur la mise en œuvre de la conception universelle de l’apprentissage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article rend compte de la perception de trois personnes étudiantes de l’international inscrites à l’Université Laval sur les apports de la mise en œuvre de principes issus de la conception universelle de l’apprentissage (CUA) dans leurs cours aux cycles supérieurs. Il a été révélé que des pratiques pédagogiques inclusives s’appuyant sur les trois principes de la CUA répondent aux besoins variés des personnes étudiantes. Toutefois, l’article met en évidence des différences dans l’application de ces principes par les personnes enseignantes. Ainsi, l’adoption de la CUA dans les cours universitaires pourrait devenir un levier pour promouvoir l’inclusion des personnes étudiantes de l’international.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".