MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413863055 · doi:10.35490/ec3.2025.438

GPT-powered Multi-agent System for Facility Management: Knowledge Graph-based Data Integration

2025· article· en· W4413863055 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueComputing in construction · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Mining Algorithms and Applications
Canadian institutionsHudbay Minerals (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceData integrationData managementGraphKnowledge managementSystems engineeringDatabaseEngineeringTheoretical computer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Facility management involves processing structured sensor data and unstructured maintenance records to monitor building performance and support decision-making. This study presents a graph-enhanced, multi-agent system that integrates a structured data storage system, a knowledge graph, and a GPT-powered LLM execution framework. A web-based interface enables users to submit natural language queries and obtain actionable insights. A case study on the Galbraith Building at UofT demonstrates how the system links historical maintenance records with sensor data. The results highlight its potential for predictive and prescriptive maintenance, while also reducing manual data processing, decreasing reliance on technical expertise, and improving operational efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.992
Threshold uncertainty score0.565

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it