MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413863209 · doi:10.35490/ec3.2025.234

Knowledge Graph-based Customer-centric Deconstruction Assessment Model

2025· article· en· W4413863209 on OpenAlexafffund
Amr S. Allam, Mazdak Nik‐Bakht

Bibliographic record

VenueComputing in construction · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTechnology and Data Analysis
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies
KeywordsComputer scienceDeconstruction (building)Knowledge managementData scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Demolition remains the dominant practice at the end-of-life stage, primarily due to its immediate economic advantages. Transitioning from demolition to deconstruction requires a shift in focus toward meeting customers' needs in the second-hand market. Therefore, the present study proposes a customer-centric deconstruction assessment model to enhance deconstruction planning. The research followed a three-stage methodology: (i) analyzing the attributes of existing deconstruction models; (ii) identifying the requirements of potential customers; and (iii) developing a knowledge graph model. The proposed model, which focused specifically on wood-based products, demonstrated its practical applicability by effectively matching products with suitable customers across five test scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputing in constructionSame topicTechnology and Data AnalysisFrench-language works237,207