Discontinuation of Oral Glucocorticoids and Achievement of Remission in Patients With Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis Treated With Benralizumab or Mepolizumab
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In the phase 3 head-to-head MANDARA study (NCT04157348), benralizumab demonstrated noninferiority to mepolizumab in inducing remission (defined as Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score [BVAS] of 0 and oral glucocorticoid [OGC] dosage ≤4 mg/day at weeks 36 and 48) in patients with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA). This analysis investigated a more stringent definition of remission that included discontinuation of OGCs and being relapse-free. METHODS: Patients aged ≥18 years with documented relapsing or refractory EGPA receiving OGCs at ≥7.5 mg/day with or without immunosuppressive therapy for ≥4 weeks before enrollment were randomized (1:1) to benralizumab at 30 mg or mepolizumab at 300 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 52 weeks. The proportion of patients achieving remission off OGCs, defined as BVAS of 0, OGC dose of 0 mg/day (at weeks 36 and 48) and no relapses during the double-masked period, was assessed. RESULTS: Patients (n = 140) were randomized to benralizumab (n = 70) or mepolizumab (n = 70). The adjusted percentage of patients with remission off OGCs was 23.5% (n = 16) with benralizumab versus 11.1% (n = 8) with mepolizumab (difference 12.47 [95% confidence interval 0.46-24.48], P = 0.042). Of those who achieved remission off OGCs, 100% of benralizumab-treated patients and 98.6% of mepolizumab-treated patients achieved remission within the first 36 weeks of treatment. CONCLUSION: The administration of anti-interleukin-5/receptor (IL-5/R) therapies, benralizumab and mepolizumab, enable discontinuation of OGCs in some patients with EGPA, while avoiding relapses. These findings suggest that adding anti-IL-5/R therapy to standard primary treatment for patients with EGPA may improve response.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".