MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413872257 · doi:10.5267/j.ijiec.2025.6.009

Performance analysis of an intelligent manufacturing cell with multi-resource collaboration

2025· article· en· W4413872257 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicScheduling and Optimization Algorithms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBasic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province
KeywordsResource (disambiguation)Manufacturing engineeringComputer scienceKnowledge managementEngineeringBusinessSystems engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Efficient resource allocation in material handling systems (MHSs) is vital for intelligent manufacturing cells with multi-resource collaboration. The interdependencies among diverse equipment types create complex interactions that increase analytical complexity, especially under stochastic batch transportation where batch sizes depend on buffer jobs and Automated Guided Vehicle (AGV) capacities. Traditional modeling approaches struggle to capture the complex dynamics of multi-level fork/join nodes under these conditions, leaving a gap in effective analysis methods. Here, we develop an open queueing network model with finite buffers, utilizing the Decomposition of State Space Method (DSSM) and Continuous-Time Markov Chain (CTMC) to systematically analyze each node's state. An iterative algorithm is employed to compute the system's performance metrics. We conduct numerical experiments comparing the approximate results of our model with simulation outcomes. Our results demonstrate that the proposed approach accurately and effectively captures the complex dynamics of multi-resource collaborative MHSs, addressing the limitations of traditional methods. This work provides a robust analytical tool for optimizing resource allocation in intelligent manufacturing systems, advancing the field of intelligent manufacturing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.402
Threshold uncertainty score0.447

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it